<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film Futurist &#187; 20&#215;200</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmfuturist.com/tag/20x200/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmfuturist.com</link>
	<description>Insights into the convergence of film &#38; media arts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:50:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does VC Funding for an Art Gallery spell the end of &#8220;High Art&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.filmfuturist.com/money-and-art/online-art-gallery-taps-into-vc-funding</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmfuturist.com/money-and-art/online-art-gallery-taps-into-vc-funding#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Dirty M**** Word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20x200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jen Bekman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmfuturist.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was struck by this article in today&#8217;s New York Times about 20&#215;200 New York gallery owner Jen Bekman&#8217;s online venture. As the piece points out, the world of &#8220;high art&#8221; may be the last holdout in the broad world of art/media/design/film shift into the online space. It must appear profitable if investors are willing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was struck by this article in today&#8217;s New York Times about <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/for-online-art-gallery-20x200-an-unlikely-investor/">20&#215;200</a> New York gallery owner Jen Bekman&#8217;s online venture. As the piece points out, the world of &#8220;high art&#8221; may be the last holdout in the broad world of art/media/design/film shift into the online space. It must appear profitable if investors are willing to bank on it in this soft economic market. And I think the take-away here is something I feel strongly about &#8211; economies of scale. While it maybe difficult to sell a $10,000 painting off a website, there is infinite opportunity on the small pricetag end of the spectrum where volume is more effective than high value. Of course this begs a lot of questions about the commodification of art, and the cheapening of a business that has always been propped up by a certain kind of knowledge and appreciation. I think the question is one that affects any artistic medium that has not traditionally been in the realm of the commercial. But it is a question we are going to be contending with more and more, as artists seek ways to make a living, and the business of art changes as it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmfuturist.com/money-and-art/online-art-gallery-taps-into-vc-funding/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
